Lawsuit alleges Apple and Amazon conspired to hike iPhone and iPad pricing.

Apple Inc. and Amazon.com Inc. were accused on Wednesday in an antitrust complaint of conspiring to increase iPhone and iPad pricing by banning practically all alternative resellers of new Apple products from Amazon’s website.

The proposed class action in federal court in Seattle challenged a deal that went into effect in January 2019, under which Apple gave Amazon discounts of up to 10 percent on its products in exchange for Amazon allowing only seven of 600 resellers to remain on its platform.

According to the complaint, this made Amazon the major reseller of new iPhones and iPads on its website, after it had previously carried a limited number of Apple devices as well as counterfeits.

According to the complaint, costs increased by more than 10%, but Apple maintained its retail prices. Once-common discounts of 20% or more are no longer the norm, the report stated.

The complaint stated, “Congress enacted antitrust statutes to prohibit the erection of entry obstacles to exclude rivals and the subsequent increase in prices following their elimination. The case is conclusive.”

Keep Reading

Apple and Amazon did not reply to demands for comment immediately. In the third quarter of this year, the combined product revenue of Cupertino, California-based Apple and Seattle-based Amazon exceeded $125 billion.

The lawsuit filed on Wednesday targets Americans who purchased new iPhones and iPads on Amazon since January 2019.

It demands specific triple damages, compensation, and an end to the alleged “collective boycott” by the corporations.

The stated plaintiff, Steven Floyd of Williamsport, Pennsylvania, alleged that he paid $319.99 for a new iPad he purchased from Amazon on the company’s website and was denied the opportunity to pay less due to Amazon’s suppression of competition.

A month ago, an Italian administrative court overturned a 173.3 million euro ($173.6 million) fine against Apple and Amazon for suspected price collusion imposed by Italy’s antitrust agency.

Floyd v. Amazon.com Inc. et al., No. 22-01599, US District Court, Western District of Washington.

Noto

Jakarta-based Newswriter for The Asian Affairs. A budding newswriter that always keep track of the latest trends and news that are happening in my country Indonesia.

Recent Posts

V Surprises ARMY with Two Holiday Releases: A Festive Collab with Park Hyo-shin and “White Christmas” Cover

For K-pop fans, the Christmas season this year has become even more magical as several of their preferred stars reveal…

November 22, 2024

Celine Names TWS as Global Ambassadors Following Suzy Bae Announcement

After Suzy Bae's nomination as Celine's worldwide ambassador, the venerable French luxury fashion company has taken another bold step choosing…

November 22, 2024

Reddit Faces Widespread Outage, Users Turn to Workarounds Amid ‘Server Error’ Messages

Thousands of users of the well-known social network Reddit were left without access after a major outage of the website.…

November 22, 2024

Anne Hathaway Casted as ‘Verity’ in Colleen Hoover’s Book Adaptation

Anne Hathaway is slated to play the much expected film version of Colleen Hoover's best-selling book Verity in front of…

November 21, 2024

Gucci Set to Revolutionize Fashion Presentations with Unified Shows in 2025 under Sabato De Sarno’s Vision

Gucci is ready to change its presentation approach for 2025 in a radical action aimed to revolutionize the fashion industry.…

November 21, 2024

South Korea’s “Korea Discount”: Addressing the Governance Gap to Boost Market Value

As world investors wait for significant changes that might solve long-standing problems of governance and responsibility in South Korea's companies,…

November 21, 2024

This website uses cookies.

Read More